Author Topic: (no subject)  (Read 10616 times)

Dude Man

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 6393
    • View Profile
    • http://dmdgames.mysticsoftware.net//
(no subject)
« Reply #60 on: March 25, 2005, 12:13:17 PM »
Guys face it. We will kill ourselfs in a huge war. KABOOM! ARRRGGG!

But it's obvious, if there are more gays then there will be less people. Unless somebody can proove me wrong on that, but last time I checked it's only humenly possible for a man and a women to reproduce.
« Last Edit: March 25, 2005, 12:15:19 PM by Dude Man »
~Welcome back mysticsoftware.net??
The Black Walkway

Number Eight

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 945
    • View Profile
(no subject)
« Reply #61 on: March 25, 2005, 12:35:19 PM »
Well, is it really that big of a deal for there to be less people? There are already tons of them...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Number Eight »
<a href=\'http://www.rammstein.com/Extras/\' target=\'_blank\'></a>
<a href=\'http://www.wakeupwalmart.com/\' target=\'_blank\'></a>
<span style=\'font-size:14pt;line-height:100%\'><a href=\'http://www.ebaumsworldsucks.com/\' target=\'_blank\'>ebaumsworld sucks</a>
<a href=\'http://www.uweflade.de/rammstein.htm\' target=\'_blank\'>benzin</a>
</span>

 TE QUIERO PUTA!

Colin

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 299
    • View Profile
(no subject)
« Reply #62 on: March 25, 2005, 01:53:21 PM »
The theory which AlienDude is incorrectly citing is actually that a percentage of people are gay to decrease the chances that those people reproduce, and thus regulate the population.
« Last Edit: March 25, 2005, 01:54:12 PM by Colin »
— Colin

Trent

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 908
    • View Profile
(no subject)
« Reply #63 on: March 25, 2005, 02:22:21 PM »
I think I'll join in on this. I've got plenty of time to confirm my desicion anyways.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Trent »
--- Trent McPheron, Twilight in Zero

Avatar by Sophia Y. Hsu.

Spyder

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1695
    • View Profile
    • http://www.mysticsoftware.net
(no subject)
« Reply #64 on: March 27, 2005, 12:41:49 AM »
Even if there were no homosexuals, their probably wouldn't be a drastic change in population... There are far too many other factors that keep the birth rate "under control".
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Spyder »

Colin

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 299
    • View Profile
(no subject)
« Reply #65 on: March 27, 2005, 12:54:49 AM »
That's because there isn't a large percentage of gays (i.e., 10%). I don't actually know much about the theory, but this number could fluctuate to act as regulation (as I said above).
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Colin »
— Colin

Spyder

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1695
    • View Profile
    • http://www.mysticsoftware.net
(no subject)
« Reply #66 on: March 27, 2005, 11:08:48 AM »
Yes, but I imagine it's pretty unlikely.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Spyder »

Cesque

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2178
    • View Profile
    • http://cesque.mysticsoftware.net
(no subject)
« Reply #67 on: March 28, 2005, 04:14:59 AM »
Quote
Even if there were no homosexuals, their probably wouldn't be a drastic change in population... There are far too many other factors that keep the birth rate "under control".


Think of homosexuality as a way of final "polishing" humanity, rounding it to a desired number.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Cesque »
TKGB cancelled Spyder.

Bastard.